Prediction of Botic Van De Zandschulp [88th] vs Borna Gojo [410th] Head-to-Head At The 1970
By Wojtek Kolan
Form
W L W L W W L L W L
Form
W L L W W L L L W WHead-To-Head: Zandschulp 1 - 1 Gojo
They have played 6 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 3 and Gojo winning 3. The last match between Zandschulp and Gojo was at the Citi Open - Washington, 02-08-2022, Second, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-4.
| Players | Head-To-Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Botic Van De Zandschulp | 1 |
| Borna Gojo | 1 |
| Zandschulp | Stats | Gojo |
|---|---|---|
| 42% (8-11) | YTD Win/Loss | 50% (6-6) |
| 1 | Head-to-Head | 1 |
| 88 | Ranking | 410 |
| 22 | Highest Rank | 72 |
| 29 | Age | 27 |
| R | Plays | R |
| 7 | Titles | 2 |
| 62% (361-225) | Career Total W/L | 59% (245-172) |
| $3,420,360 | Career Prize Money | $633,225 |
| 0 | YTD Titles | 0 |
| 1 | Hard H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Clay H2H | 1 |
| 0 | Indoor H2H | 0 |
| 0 | Grass H2H | 0 |
Recent Performance Stats (Last 6 Months)
Zandschulp VS Gojo H2H Matches played
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-4 |
Stats 
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Borna Gojo
61%
(
72 of
118)
1st Serve %
66%
(
85 of
128)
12
Aces
13
14
Double Faults
12
83%
(
60 of
72)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
62 of
85)
41%
(
19 of
46)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
18 of
43)
18%
(
2 of
11)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
33%
(
39 of
118)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
48 of
128)
127
Total Points Won
119
|
||||
| 7-6(8) 2-6 6-4 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
60%
(
58 of
96)
1st Serve %
68%
(
77 of
113)
8
Aces
3
2
Double Faults
8
64%
(
37 of
58)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
50 of
77)
50%
(
19 of
38)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
20 of
36)
33%
(
3 of
9)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
42%
(
40 of
96)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
43 of
113)
99
Total Points Won
110
|
||||
Zandschulp VS Gojo H2H Stats
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches | 1 |
| 3 | Sets Won | 3 |
| 35 | Games Won | 32 |
| 15 | Aces (Total) | 21 |
| 22 | Total Double Faults | 14 |
| 2:51:28 | Average Match Time | 2:51:28 |
| 65% (149/231) | 1st Serve % | 64% (143/224) |
| 74% (110/149) | 1st Serve Win % | 69% (99/143) |
| 48% (39/82) | 2nd Serve Win % | 46% (37/81) |
| 30% (6/20) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 27% (4/15) |
| 39% (88/224) | Return Points Win % | 35% (82/231) |
| 50% (1/2) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 0% (0/0) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 0% (0/0) |
| 33% (1/3) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 67% (2/3) |
| 50% (1/2) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (1/2) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 100% (1/1) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (1/0) |
| 0% (1/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (1/0) |
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
Botic Van De Zandschulp vs Borna Gojo Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Zandschulp 1 - 1 Gojo
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Zandschulp has won 42.86% of points on their second serve, while Gojo has won 44.06%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Zandschulp, in recent form, has won 46.68% of their opponent's second serve points, while Gojo has won 46.41%. The same stats for first serve returns are 27.33% and 20.1% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Zandschulp has saved 50% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Gojo has saved 54.67% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Zandschulp has won 51.47% of matches played (W/L 35/ 33), with Gojo winning 57.14% (W/L 16/ 12) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Zandschulp has their best career surface win % on I.hard, winning 63% (W/L 93/ 54), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 46% (W/L 11/ 13). Gojo has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 62% (W/L 120/ 74), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 42% (W/L 8/ 11).
- Player level: In the last year, Zandschulp has played most of their matches on the Main tour, winning 44.44% of matches (W/L 12/ 15), where as Gojo has played most of their matches on the Challengers/ITF tournaments > $10K, winning 62.5% of matches (W/L 10/ 6). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Gojo being victorious 1 times. They have played 6 sets in total, with Zandschulp winning 3 and Gojo winning 3. The last match between Zandschulp and Gojo was at the Citi Open - Washington, 02-08-2022, Second, Hard with Botic Van De Zandschulp getting the victory 7-6(6) 6-7(5) 6-4.
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 2:51:28.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Zandschulp and Gojo have played a deciding set 2 times, with Zandschulp winning 1 times and Gojo 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Zandschulp winning 1, and Gojo 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Zandschulp has played against opponents with an average rank of 138.24 while Gojo has played against players with an average rank of 228.71.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Zandschulp has won 43% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Gojo has won 42% in all matches played on tour.
- Current event H2H stats: Past player performance is very useful in predicting tennis matches, but once an event is under way we should also look at current event stats for in form player indication, so check the section below (if they have played a match in the current event). Some players also perform better at certain events and this should be taken into account when picking the outcome.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Zandschulp has converted 30.22% of breakpoint opportunities, and Gojo has converted 34.72% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Botic Van De Zandschulp Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Learner Tien
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
58%
(
29 of
50)
1st Serve %
48%
(
26 of
54)
1
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
4
76%
(
22 of
29)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
16 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
8 of
28)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
36%
(
18 of
50)
Rtn Points Won
56%
(
30 of
54)
62
Total Points Won
42
|
6-2 6-2 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Max Hans Rehberg
56%
(
25 of
45)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
3
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
6
84%
(
21 of
25)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
17 of
24)
65%
(
13 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
7 of
22)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
24%
(
11 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
22 of
46)
56
Total Points Won
35
|
6-3 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Richard Gasquet
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
64%
(
63 of
98)
1st Serve %
59%
(
55 of
93)
2
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
5
65%
(
41 of
63)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
36 of
55)
51%
(
18 of
35)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
15 of
38)
40%
(
6 of
15)
Break Points Won
40%
(
4 of
10)
40%
(
39 of
98)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
42 of
93)
101
Total Points Won
90
|
4-6 7-5 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Francisco Cerundolo
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
54%
(
38 of
71)
1st Serve %
65%
(
37 of
57)
2
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
2
66%
(
25 of
38)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
24 of
37)
61%
(
20 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
9 of
20)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
37%
(
26 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
24 of
57)
69
Total Points Won
59
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Novak Djokovic
71%
(
58 of
82)
1st Serve %
67%
(
49 of
73)
4
Aces
0
4
Double Faults
3
60%
(
35 of
58)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
31 of
49)
71%
(
17 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
37%
(
30 of
82)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
35 of
73)
87
Total Points Won
68
|
6-2 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Nick Kyrgios
59%
(
35 of
59)
1st Serve %
58%
(
34 of
59)
2
Aces
6
3
Double Faults
2
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve Won
68%
(
23 of
34)
54%
(
13 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
36%
(
9 of
25)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
29%
(
2 of
7)
36%
(
21 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
27 of
59)
65
Total Points Won
53
|
7-6(7) 3-0 ret. | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Matteo Gigante
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
68%
(
40 of
59)
1st Serve %
39%
(
21 of
54)
5
Aces
3
5
Double Faults
1
75%
(
30 of
40)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
11 of
21)
32%
(
6 of
19)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
14 of
33)
75%
(
6 of
8)
Break Points Won
40%
(
2 of
5)
39%
(
23 of
59)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
29 of
54)
65
Total Points Won
48
|
7-5 6-0 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Lukas Klein
51%
(
63 of
124)
1st Serve %
56%
(
71 of
127)
7
Aces
2
7
Double Faults
8
67%
(
42 of
63)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
39 of
71)
44%
(
27 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
25 of
56)
37%
(
7 of
19)
Break Points Won
25%
(
5 of
20)
44%
(
55 of
124)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
63 of
127)
132
Total Points Won
119
|
5-7 6-3 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Christopher O'Connell
Player
Botic Van De Zandschulp
61%
(
53 of
87)
1st Serve %
51%
(
35 of
68)
2
Aces
5
1
Double Faults
3
62%
(
33 of
53)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
24 of
35)
50%
(
17 of
34)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
11 of
33)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
43%
(
37 of
87)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
33 of
68)
83
Total Points Won
72
|
7-6(5) 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Botic Van De Zandschulp
Player
Andrea Vavassori
73%
(
36 of
49)
1st Serve %
50%
(
24 of
48)
2
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
4
75%
(
27 of
36)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
14 of
24)
62%
(
8 of
13)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
1)
29%
(
14 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
24 of
48)
59
Total Points Won
38
|
6-1 6-3 | H2H | ||
view more
Borna Gojo Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| QF |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Alexander Shevchenko
67%
(
40 of
60)
1st Serve %
61%
(
42 of
69)
7
Aces
5
2
Double Faults
0
73%
(
29 of
40)
1st Serve Won
50%
(
21 of
42)
45%
(
9 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
59%
(
16 of
27)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
37%
(
22 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
46%
(
32 of
69)
70
Total Points Won
59
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Daniel Masur
59%
(
39 of
66)
1st Serve %
65%
(
46 of
71)
11
Aces
9
0
Double Faults
1
82%
(
32 of
39)
1st Serve Won
80%
(
37 of
46)
70%
(
19 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
11 of
25)
20%
(
1 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
23%
(
15 of
66)
Rtn Points Won
32%
(
23 of
71)
74
Total Points Won
63
|
6-3 7-6(6) | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Hamad Medjedovic
Player
Borna Gojo
69%
(
33 of
48)
1st Serve %
56%
(
54 of
96)
3
Aces
8
0
Double Faults
2
76%
(
25 of
33)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
39 of
54)
60%
(
9 of
15)
2nd Serve Won
26%
(
11 of
42)
27%
(
4 of
15)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
29%
(
14 of
48)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
46 of
96)
80
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Vit Kopriva
Player
Borna Gojo
63%
(
53 of
84)
1st Serve %
62%
(
45 of
73)
3
Aces
5
3
Double Faults
4
64%
(
34 of
53)
1st Serve Won
64%
(
29 of
45)
52%
(
16 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
13 of
28)
100%
(
5 of
5)
Break Points Won
44%
(
4 of
9)
40%
(
34 of
84)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
31 of
73)
81
Total Points Won
76
|
2-6 6-2 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Stan Wawrinka
Player
Borna Gojo
51%
(
22 of
43)
1st Serve %
70%
(
38 of
54)
3
Aces
4
4
Double Faults
2
91%
(
20 of
22)
1st Serve Won
55%
(
21 of
38)
57%
(
12 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
7 of
16)
57%
(
4 of
7)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
26%
(
11 of
43)
Rtn Points Won
48%
(
26 of
54)
58
Total Points Won
39
|
6-2 6-3 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Matteo Martineau
65%
(
37 of
57)
1st Serve %
51%
(
26 of
51)
9
Aces
2
2
Double Faults
5
78%
(
29 of
37)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
19 of
26)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
32%
(
8 of
25)
44%
(
4 of
9)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
35%
(
20 of
57)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
24 of
51)
61
Total Points Won
47
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Ergi Kirkin
64%
(
28 of
44)
1st Serve %
45%
(
20 of
44)
7
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
14 of
20)
69%
(
11 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
33%
(
8 of
24)
80%
(
4 of
5)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
20%
(
9 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
50%
(
22 of
44)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Miomir Kecmanovic
Player
Borna Gojo
73%
(
37 of
51)
1st Serve %
67%
(
39 of
58)
3
Aces
11
0
Double Faults
2
86%
(
32 of
37)
1st Serve Won
69%
(
27 of
39)
36%
(
5 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
9 of
19)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
27%
(
14 of
51)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
22 of
58)
59
Total Points Won
50
|
6-4 6-4 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Aziz Dougaz
Player
Borna Gojo
66%
(
61 of
92)
1st Serve %
51%
(
43 of
85)
14
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
4
74%
(
45 of
61)
1st Serve Won
77%
(
33 of
43)
48%
(
15 of
31)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
19 of
42)
43%
(
3 of
7)
Break Points Won
13%
(
1 of
8)
35%
(
32 of
92)
Rtn Points Won
39%
(
33 of
85)
93
Total Points Won
84
|
6-4 3-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
| Q2 |
Stats
Borna Gojo
Player
Vit Kopriva
70%
(
47 of
67)
1st Serve %
54%
(
40 of
74)
12
Aces
4
3
Double Faults
5
85%
(
40 of
47)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
29 of
40)
40%
(
8 of
20)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
17 of
34)
60%
(
3 of
5)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
28%
(
19 of
67)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
28 of
74)
76
Total Points Won
65
|
2-6 6-3 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Where To Watch Zandschulp vs Gojo?
When the match starts we will have live scores and stats on this page. For live streaming at TV channels of this match, see our ATP and WTA worldwide viewing pages. Free trial live streaming of Zandschulp Vs Gojo is now available here.
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 62% (361/225) | Win/Loss | 59% (245/172) |
| 58% (822/586) | Sets Win/Loss | 57% (566/433) |
| 53% (7057/6235) | Games Win/Loss | 52% (5198/4703) |
| 0.44 | Aces Per Game | 0.65 |
| 2857 | Aces Total | 3146 |
| 0.33 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.29 |
| 2125 | Total Double Faults | 1385 |
| 1:35:25 | Average Match Time | 1:37:3 |
| 384.11 | Average Opponent Rank | 220.63 |
| 62% (23829/38718) | 1st Serve % | 62% (18490/29699) |
| 71% (17021/23829) | 1st Serve Win % | 74% (13632/18490) |
| 48% (7177/14892) | 2nd Serve Win % | 49% (5534/11209) |
| 43% (1767/4096) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 40% (1024/2549) |
| 41% (16238/39906) | Return Points Win % | 37% (10952/29275) |
| 62% (334/535) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 59% (239/408) |
| 53% (20/38) | Best of 5 Sets Win % | 63% (5/8) |
| 56% (100/180) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 52% (109/208) |
| 58% (111/193) | Deciding Set Win % | 54% (84/157) |
| 89% (340/301) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 82% (245/202) |
| 11% (340/38) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 18% (245/43) |
| 24% (244/59) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 24% (171/41) |
See recent tennis photos of Zandschulp and Gojo
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Botic Van De Zandschulp
View full predicted draw for Zandschulp in Munich
Potential H2H Matches This Week For Borna Gojo
View full predicted draw for Gojo in Munich
Other Predictions
Today's Tennis Prediction News :
- Loading news...
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
